<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Tim Maudlin on Podcast To Books</title><link>https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/guests/tim-maudlin/</link><description>Recent content in Tim Maudlin on Podcast To Books</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.145.0</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/guests/tim-maudlin/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Tim Maudlin: Quantum Nonlocality Explained FROM SCRATCH</title><link>https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/curt-jaimungal/tim-maudlin-quantum-nonlocality-explained-from-scratch/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/curt-jaimungal/tim-maudlin-quantum-nonlocality-explained-from-scratch/</guid><description>&lt;audio id="episode-audio" controls preload="none" style="width: 100%; max-width: 800px;">
&lt;source src="https://s.gum.fm/s-62d83916a854b1cc0031878d/pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.megaphone.fm/TEMI9509822951.mp3" type="audio/mpeg">
Your browser does not support the audio element.
&lt;/audio>
&lt;h2 id="mentioned-books">Mentioned Books&lt;/h2>
&lt;div class="episode-books">
&lt;div class="episode-book">
&lt;a class="episode-book-cover" href="https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/books/quantum-reality-nick-herbert/">&lt;img src="https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/238424-M.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" width="80" height="120">
&lt;/a>
&lt;div class="episode-book-body">
&lt;div class="episode-book-title">&lt;a href="https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/books/quantum-reality-nick-herbert/">Quantum Reality&lt;/a> &lt;span class="episode-book-author">by Nick Herbert&lt;/span>&lt;/div>&lt;p class="episode-book-desc">In this book, leading physicist Nick Herbert has created a key work which goes far deeper into its subject than the acknowledged classics in the field. Dr. Herbert addresses the age-old question: What is reality? by firs…&lt;/p>&lt;blockquote class="mention-quote">“zero, Bob minus 60. And this particular proof I personally learned from the book by Nick Herbert called Quantum Reality. So shout out to Nick Herbert, nice, clear proof. So let&amp;#39;s just try and do it. Here&amp;#39;s our chart. And we have all these runs at the experiment because remember these are”&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;div class="episode-book-links">&lt;a class="seek" href="#t=8429.46" data-t="8429.46">▶ Play at 2:20:29&lt;/a>
&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0385235690?tag=podcaststoboo-20" target="_blank" rel="noopener sponsored">Amazon&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div></description></item><item><title>Tim Maudlin: Quantum Mechanics Explained FROM SCRATCH</title><link>https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/curt-jaimungal/tim-maudlin-quantum-mechanics-explained-from-scratch/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://mcaneff.github.io/podcasts-to-books/curt-jaimungal/tim-maudlin-quantum-mechanics-explained-from-scratch/</guid><description>&lt;p>I personally subscribe to The Economist. TOE listeners get 35% off the annual subscription. No other podcast has this! &lt;a href="https://economist.com/TOE">https://economist.com/TOE&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This is a careful lecture that can be followed with zero background knowledge. Einstein thought he&amp;rsquo;d caught quantum mechanics in an act of spookiness — this podcast asks whether he was even worried about the right thing. Tim Maudlin, professor of philosophy at NYU and a leading philosopher of physics, delivers a rare full lecture tracing Einstein, EPR, and the road to Bell&amp;rsquo;s theorem. The central claim: Einstein&amp;rsquo;s real objection was never determinism — &amp;ldquo;God does not play dice&amp;rdquo; is a red herring — but non-locality, which he inferred rather than assumed. Maudlin traces the argument from Einstein&amp;rsquo;s overlooked 1927 Solvay objection through the EPR paper&amp;rsquo;s criterion of reality, showing why Bohr&amp;rsquo;s famous reply never actually answered it.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>