I personally subscribe to The Economist. TOE listeners get 35% off the annual subscription. No other podcast has this! https://economist.com/TOE
This is a careful lecture that can be followed with zero background knowledge. Einstein thought he’d caught quantum mechanics in an act of spookiness — this podcast asks whether he was even worried about the right thing. Tim Maudlin, professor of philosophy at NYU and a leading philosopher of physics, delivers a rare full lecture tracing Einstein, EPR, and the road to Bell’s theorem. The central claim: Einstein’s real objection was never determinism — “God does not play dice” is a red herring — but non-locality, which he inferred rather than assumed. Maudlin traces the argument from Einstein’s overlooked 1927 Solvay objection through the EPR paper’s criterion of reality, showing why Bohr’s famous reply never actually answered it.
FOLLOW:
- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e
- Substack: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/subscribe
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt
- Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs
- Crypto: https://nowpayments.io/donation/TOE
- PayPal: https://www.paypal.
Mentioned Books
“does special relativity allow for superluminal non signaling but this allows superluminal signaling look this is a good excellent question the first book I wrote quantum non-locality and relativity is exactly on this question namely everybody thinks relativity prevents something from going”