Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal

Your browser does not support the audio element. Mentioned Books Consciousness Explained by Daniel Dennett Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson What Is It Like to Be a Bat? by Thomas Nagel (Essay)

Curt Jaimungal argues that astrophysicists like Neil deGrasse Tyson and spiritual gurus Deepak Chopra and Thomas Campbell can’t logically claim they don’t hold beliefs. This “Theories of Everything” with Curt Jaimungal episode uses analytic philosophy to show why belief’s vital for understanding physics and consciousness, countering what Thomas Campbell and NASA scientist Nathalie Cabrol say. As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! ...

What is mathematics, really? Mathematician David Bessis joins me to argue that math isn’t about numbers in a Platonic realm or a meaningless game of symbols—it’s a cognitive technology for rewiring your brain. We explore why the official definitions of mathematics have been unresolved for 2,300 years, why understanding something means finding it obvious, and how the gap between a beginner and Terence Tao looks less like genetic destiny and more like compound interest on intuition. When asked what mathematics fundamentally is, his answer cuts through millennia of philosophy: it’s what happens in your head when you pretend something is true until it feels real. ...

What if gravity is just entropy in disguise? Professor Erik Verlinde joins me to argue that gravity isn’t a fundamental force—it’s thermodynamic, emerging from quantum information the way gas pressure emerges from molecules bouncing around. We explore why spacetime may be stitched together by entanglement, and how dark energy and dark matter both pop out automatically without extra particles or parameters. Verlinde explains why the cosmological constant problem is a red herring, and why there may be no final theory of physics. When asked where the universe comes from, his answer is one word: chaos. ...

Hot off the press, Professor Subir Sarkar makes the case that dark energy doesn’t exist (and he’s not being provocative for its own sake). He’s the former head of Oxford’s particle theory group, serves on the Particle Data Group. Sarkar’s group has found that the cosmic acceleration supposedly driving the universe’s expansion is directional—not uniform as required by a cosmological constant—appearing only in the direction we’re moving through space. He claims the 2011 Nobel Prize-winning discovery rests on a century-old assumption of cosmic isotropy that his data now falsifies at over 5 sigma. “We need to go back to square one.” ...